Safflower, drought muddling lygus picture

Jun 13, 2007 10:10 AM, By Pete Goodell
UC IPM Advisor/Acting UC Statewide IPM Director, Kearney Ag Center, Parlier, Calif.


As the 2007 season unfolds, insect pests have been absent from the production scene. While Lygus has not been an early season problem, it is a pest always waiting in the wings.

The dry and cold winter prevented the development of Lygus hosts and presumably the over winter Lygus population was forced into San Joaquin Valley before they could reproduce in the rangeland and western hills.

In most of the Valley, the most common source of Lygus is not rangeland or native areas but local crops surrounding the field. In recent years, the familiar landscape of the San Joaquin Valley has changed. Some of the changes might improve cotton pest management while others may increase the problem or have no impact.

For example, the increase in alfalfa acres to support the dairy industry has generally been a benefit by providing preferred season long habitat. Corn acreage has increased also in support of the dairy industry but also acreage has increased due to the new biofuel demand. The impact of corn acreage has been primarily neutral on its impact on cotton pest management.

Safflower acres have increased in 2007 also due to increased demand for biofuels and this crop has historically been a major source of Lygus into cotton.

The degree of severity of Lygus in any particular cotton field during July is related to its proximity to fields with migrating population. The grower and PCA should be well aware of potential threats from surrounding crops.

Safflower is a well-known source of Lygus. Many PCAS have experience with cotton fields adjacent to safflower in which Lygus populations increased dramatically within a few days. As the crop matures, fields that border the safflower source become the sink for the migrating population. In the 1970’s, UC suggested treating safflower to prevent Lygus movement.

The control action is timed to coincide about 50-70 percent of the population has reached the 3rd to 5th instars in order to prevent the population from becoming adults and capable of flight. Treatment should be applied when 667 dd>52F are accumulated after planting or commonly, April 1. Using temperature data from West Side Research and Extension Center at Five Points, Calif., 667 dd>52F were accumulated by May 23, 2007.

It has been many years since as many acres of safflower have been planted. While the approach to manage Lygus in safflower and prevent its movement into adjacent cotton has merit, there are several problems with program. First, it assumes the all safflower fields have Lygus populations. Since safflower is so difficult (and painful!) to sample, sampling with a sweep net or vacuum sampler is not very efficient. Thus, it is usually assumed that Lygus will come out of a safflower field.

The second problem is that the products available for use against Lygus are not very efficacious or environmentally friendly. Finally, the few fields I have observed are only beginning to head and have several weeks before they would become unsuitable for Lygus habitat. It appears to this observer that a treatment on May 23 would have been a little preemptive.

This is NOT to say that Lygus should NOT be managed in safflower in order to limit damage in cotton. I am hoping to do some observational studies this summer to take a look at the Sevacherian, Stern and Mueller model.

The next crop that plays a key role in Lygus management, both positive and potentially negative, is alfalfa hay. In situations where alfalfa fields are isolated from other alfalfa fields, preservation of habitat is essential. Leaving a few strips of uncut alfalfa as a dike against Lygus flow into cotton is a very effective practice. Published work has illustrated that impact on hay quality by mixing older and younger hay is minimal. Providing habitat in an alfalfa field, mitigates mass movement of Lygus out of harvest hay and into cotton.

In areas where alfalfa hay is abundant, uncut neighboring fields provide the same function in providing alternative habitat to cotton fields.

Alfalfa seed is another major source of Lygus even though the fields are closely monitored and Lygus managed very conservatively. Once dried in preparation for harvest, movement will occur rapidly.

In speaking with PCAs recently, they suggested that in water short years like 2007, there is the potential for some alfalfa fields to be short of water. If a grower must make a choice in permanent crops or alfalfa, the alfalfa may be left to dry down in July or August, potentially releasing a large influx of Lygus. In order to avoid large migrations in these situations, the grower might be able to manage water for a check or two neighboring the cotton to prevent complete removal of alfalfa habitat.

When considering Lygus treatment in cotton, remember to incorporate square retention with Lygus numbers. The presence of nymphs is essential in triggering a treatment since adults are so mobile in moving in and out of a field. Lygus management guidelines, including plant and bug based thresholds, are at www.ipm.ucdavis.edu, click on Agriculture & Floriculture, then click on Cotton, and finally click Lygus Bug.

Finally, Lygus is not the only insect that must be watched. Aphids, worms, mites and whiteflies also need to be considered when considering Lygus treatments. New products for many of these pests have become registered in recent years. Integrating some of the new products and their modes of action may offer opportunities in selectivity and later season efficacy we have not had in the past.

In summary:

--Watch the cotton crop development closely

--Adjust production practices to the growth and development of the crop and manage vegetative growth

--Watch Lygus populations in surrounding crops and weeds; be prepared for their migration

--Inspect the fields frequently; weekly or twice weekly

--If any doubt on the cause of square loss, split squares and look for evidence of Lygus damage

--Trigger insecticide applications based on population estimates and realistic fruit retention expectations

--Use the appropriate insecticide for the situation

I will have a crew sampling cotton fields for Lygus from Corcoran to San Joaquin as part of the large interstate USDA grant and expect to be in the field with them on a frequent basis through June. Let me know what further assistance I can provide.

Get Copyright ClearanceWant to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2008 Penton Media, Inc.


Latest Jobs

resources

events icon events

product info icon tradeshows

tradeshow icon digests

research icon photos

Continuing Education

ACCREDITED IN CALIFORNIA ONLY:


Almond Pest Management

Get the latest info on almond insect pest management and earn 2 hrs. CE DPR and CCA credit in California.

California Groundwater Protection Regulations

Earn 2 hrs. in California laws and regs CE and learn how to protect California groundwater supplies.

(New Course)
Disease Management in California Almonds

Managing diseases in California almond production is a year-long process. This course provides the latest information on controlling these diseases with management practices and fungicides. The course is approved for 2 CEUs by DPR for PCAs and all applicator categories and California CCAs.

Powdery Mildew Control in California Grapevines

Learn about the No. 1 grape disease in California; earn 2 California CE hours.

ACCREDITED IN CALIFORNIA AND ARIZONA:


Insecticide Resistance Management in Agronomic and Row Crops

A 3-hr. CE approved for California and Arizona licensees and CCAs in both states.

Agronomic Weed Resistance Management in Row Crops, Trees Nuts and Vines

Weeds Resistance Management is approved for 3 hours of CE credit for all California and Arizona licensees and Certified Crop Advisers.

Lepidopterous Pest Management/ Pesticide Safety

This course is approved for 2 hours in Arizona and California (1 hr. of laws/regs; 1 hour Other) and for CCAs.

Managing Spray Drift to Minimize Problems

2-hrs laws and regs for California licensees; 2 hours in Arizona and for CCAs.

(New Course)
The Role of Copper in Disease Control

Copper has long been a key tool in disease control in a many crops. This 2-CEU course accredited California PCAs and all DPR applicator categories and Arizona applicators details how best to use copper to maximize its potential.

Back to Top

Browse Print Issues

Additional Resources

subscribe to Farm Press Daily Southeast Farm Press Southwest Farm Press Delta Farm Press