Twelve reasons to reject EWG’s Dirty Dozen

What is in this article?:

  • Consumers should not rely on the Environmental Working Group's "Dirty Dozen" list when deciding which fruits and vegetables to purchase.
  • In fact, recent consumer research has shown that EWG's Dirty Dozen list is actually causing some people to consider dismissing this "eat more" advice from health officials.

Scientists, nutritionists, health and farming experts all agree that consumers should not rely on the Environmental Working Group's "Dirty Dozen" list when deciding which fruits and vegetables to purchase.

Instead, consumers should simply follow the advice of health experts everywhere and eat more conventionally and organically grown fruits and vegetables since both farming methods produce very safe foods.

In fact, recent consumer research has shown that EWG's Dirty Dozen list is actually causing some people to consider dismissing this "eat more" advice from health officials.

Read on to see a dozen reasons NOT to use EWG's "Dirty Dozen" list.

1. After hearing EWG statements about the "Dirty Dozen" list, almost 10 percent of low-income consumers stated that they would reduce their consumption of fruits and vegetables.
Scared Fat: Are Consumers Being Scared Away from Healthy Foods?
Alliance for Food and Farming Report, June 2012.

2. EWG contradicts themselves. "To be on the safer side, I'd pick the organic blue berries or bell peppers that had never been doused in toxic pesticides. EWG does believe that both the organic and conventional versions of all produce on the market are safe to eat." Alex Formuzis, Vice President, EWG. Huffington Post, May 2012.

3. "You don't have to eat organic to eat healthily. Eating real food, whether it's organic or not, is going to do a lot for your health. Any apple is good for you." Michael Pollan, Best Selling Author, Professor of Science and Environmental Journalism, University of California, Berkeley and Lecturer on Food, Agriculture, Health and the Environment. Boston Globe, January 2012.

4. "For all of us involved in promoting better consumer health, increasing consumption of fruits and vegetables is among our main objectives. The benefits of consuming plenty of fruits and vegetables is absolutely indisputable. Consumers should eat both organic and conventionally grown produce without worrying about minute levels of pesticide residues." Dr. Carl Keen, Professor of Nutrition and Internal Medicine at University of California, Davis.

5. "A focus on nutrition in general would be much more beneficial to human health than this misguided focus on extraordinarily small contamination levels of pesticides. Every chemical has toxicity, but it's all in the dose. The amount of pesticides present as residues on food is miniscule." Discovery News. Samuel Cohen, a pathologist with expertise in toxicology and carcinogenesis, University of Nebraska Medical Center, August 2011.

6. "From a scientific perspective, however, the AFF (Alliance for Food and Farming) seems to be on solid ground. The EWG report cites not a single study to support a direct link between pesticide residue and health effects." James McWilliams. New York Times, October 2010.

Discuss this Article 4

Anonymous (not verified)
on Jun 28, 2012

1. 10% is not statistically significant with the 3..5% margin of error suggested by the surveyors.
2. It is not a contradiction to say that some conventionally grown fruits are lower toxicity than others and that one’s personal preference to avoid certain conventionally grown produce is based on an awareness of this.
3. This reaffirms what EWG’s president indicates on their homepage and in the executive summary.
4. See above. The author of this article is clearly taking statements out of context in order to cut down straw men.
5. The amount of pesticides as “miniscule” is relative, and the US has far more lenient MRL laws than the EU and Japan. A blood cell is “miniscule” and yet the cancer that it contains can still kill someone.
6. The EWG study reflects aggregated data findings from residue tests and does not seek to address ongoing studies of health effects of chemicals. Indeed, this is a deficiency.
7. I’m not sure this is a good reason; I guess smoking crack in moderation is OK too?
8. See #6.
9. This is simple paranoia. If more information is bad because it may influence people to overreact, then we should simply have no information at all? Go back to high school and read 1984.
10. USDA = GOD? This organization is well staffed, well trained, and well managed, agreed, but it’s made mistakes and, aware of this, continues to review and renew its policies regularly. This statement should have “based on current information” somewhere in it.
11. Here the word “often” is allowing you to propagate misinformation and any ag worker will tell you that produce “often” absorbs pesticides systemically (ie: can’t be washed away).
12. Yes, so Big Macs every meal!

Anonymous (not verified)
on Sep 24, 2012

Hello, where did you get your info on MRL's. If our products here in the US are so tainted why then are the EU and Japan taking our fruit and veggies at an amazing rate. If our food grown in US is so bad, why then is the agricultural export so large? So large is our export of food and food items, it is reversing the trade imbalance.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Sep 16, 2012

Special interest group versus unbiased scientific evidence....

Anonymous (not verified)
on Apr 23, 2013

What a load of bunk. I'd hate to have this author represent me in court. 'Smoke and mirrors' arguments don't work too well there. Organic is BEST.

Non hodgkins lymphoma has increased dramatically from one of the rarest cancers to one of the most common. Glyphosphate is linked to this type of cancer. If pesticides and herbicides are so safe why do farmers have to where masks, protective eye wear and long sleeves and trousers?

Conventional farming is not conventional. Its new school. It uses poisons and fake fertiliser. It weakens plants, reduces nutrition levels, destroys topsoil and soil biota, poisons air soil and water, bees and people. Oh, and it makes a lot of money for the chemical companies both on the farm and in the hospitals and pharmacies.

Join the dots. It isn't hard. Come on, you can do it.

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Western Farm Press ID
(optional)

Continuing Education Courses
This accredited CE course focuses on choosing the correct variety alfalfa based on a number of...
New Course
The 2,000-member Weed Science Society of America’s (WSSA) Herbicide Resistance Action...

The course details six of the primary diseases affecting citrus: Huanglongbing (Citrus...

Newsletter Signup