Wine grape challenges of the 2010 season

What is in this article?:

  • Overall conditions were conducive to powdery mildew, but there were enough washing rains and very cool temperatures, so that problems were scattered and light where normal control programs were followed.
  • The big concerns on the mind of many growers were new pests.
  • The overall crop came in well below last year’s crop and slightly less than average in yield for most varieties in most sites.

The 2010 season presented interesting challenges to growers both long-experienced and relatively new. With the World Series under way, what comes to mind is after several very warm years Mother Nature decided on a changeup. Budbreak began slightly behind average, with weather conditions somewhat rainy and very mild the entire season. One grower mentioned they would rather grow grapes in a hot year as opposed to a cool year, as challenges seem more straightforward. That being said, fruit quality appears to be excellent, with good colors, nice flavors and higher total acids and lower pH. The double-edged sword is a light crop; the early spring rains and continued cool temperatures did reduce cluster development, flower set, and yield. Individual growers sacrifice income, but that should avoid an oversupply of wine as the economy struggles.

Overall conditions were conducive to powdery mildew, but there were enough washing rains and very cool temperatures, so that problems were scattered and light where normal control programs were followed. The early May rain of more than an inch helped reduce stress on vines and might have been part of the reason mite problems appeared light, as with leafhoppers. Compared to last year, this season there was less summer (sour) bunch rot in tight-clustered and thin-skinned varieties such as Zinfandel and Petite Sirah.

The big concerns on the mind of many growers were new pests to the county; light brown apple moth (LBAM) found in the south county in 2009, spotted wing Drosophila (SWD) also found in 2009, and European grapevine moth (EGVM) found in August of this year in east Lodi. The good news seems that SWD doesn‘t damage wine grapes as much as cherries or bush berries. The bad news has been that both EGVM and LBAM require quarantines and compliance agreement programs for growers in affected areas, as well as the added cost of possible treatments. Fortunately, only two EGVM were found and no new finds have occurred.

Discuss this article 2

There is NO THREAT caused by the LBAM ANYWHERE it is found in the world. The moth has been in the state for decades and has, by CDFA's own admission in their EIR, NOT CAUSED ANY DAMAGE in the state. The moth was misclassified decades ago and the USDA and CDFA refuse to respect modern research and knowledge regarding the real threat of this innocuous insect. In New Zealand, where it has been found for more then 100 years (this is true also for Hawaii, the UK, and everywhere it is native or has been introduced) farmers are required to provide only LBAM-free produce if they intend to export to the US. New Zealand farmers are not subject to quarantines, do not have to have LBAM-free farms, and the government helps these farmers with useful information on control. Our CDFA and USDA are not there to help just prevent farmers from doing their jobs and imposing restrictions. LBAM is easy to control with organic IPM methods.

The ONLY threat of LBAM is the inspections and draconian quarantines imposed on our farmers and the violation of our farms and businesses by the CDFA/USDA. The media and agricultural commissioners have not acted responsibly and need to check the misinformation they promulgate as facts regarding the LBAM and the eradication program.

Be aware that the mating disruption hormones used to reduce the number of LBAM have never had efficacy tests completed in any setting outside of agriculture. The CDFA do not know if these substances will even work. These chemical pheromones have also never been tested for any effects on humans. Please understand that the levels of these artificial substances being used in urban areas are at levels 10's of thousands of times more concentrated than those encountered in nature. What are the effects of these very persistent chemicals on humans? No one knows? Do you want to accept that risk?

Resist the quarantines, ask questions, get educated (Northern California resisted after the CDFA sprayed regions of Santa Cruz and Monterey counties with synthetic chemicals never meant for or tested for exposure to humans and without any efficacy tests on how these treatments might work), urge reclassification of LBAM. Refuse to sign compliance agreements until all of your questions are answered. Stand up and fight with legal challenges. LBAM is not a threat, our Ag agencies are the real threat despite the fact their job is to protect us.

By Stan Roller (not verified)  on Nov 17, 2010

Lets stay accurate here.

The Light Brown Apple Moth has NOT a single documented case of damage in the State of California. If you disagree, check any agriculture commissioner office in the State and you will find that there is NO DAMAGE from LBAM.

CDFA placing quarantines are real enough, but lets not forget that CDFA misses it some times.

Whether it's a mistake of a bureaucratic organization or just a ploy to create pesticide contracts for the privileged insider chemical companies is a debatable question.

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Nov 18, 2010
Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Western Farm Press ID
(optional)

Continuing Education Courses
New Course
The 2,000-member Weed Science Society of America’s (WSSA) Herbicide Resistance Action...
New Course

The course details six of the primary diseases affecting citrus: Huanglongbing (Citrus...

Get the latest info on almond insect pest management.
Farmer-to-Farmer Used Equipment