Single Delta tunnel means disaster for SJV farmers

  • A disaster may await San Joaquin Valley farmers if a plan featuring a single tunnel to convey water through the Delta becomes a reality.

Dos Palos farmer Shawn Coburn told Delta Stewardship Council members that a disaster awaits him and other San Joaquin Valley farmers if a plan featuring a single tunnel to convey water through the Delta becomes a reality.

Coburn pointed out that the single tunnel would cut water deliveries to south-of-the-Delta water users by a third. Farmers within the federal Central Valley Project (CVP) service area, where Coburn farms, would receive about 485,000 acre-feet of water instead of the 1.8 million acre-feet needed to grow their crops.

"We are looking at the potential of 750,000 acres going unplanted," he said.

Coburn distributed a fact sheet developed by the California Farm Water Coalition that revealed that six out of every 10 acres farmed with CVP water would be in jeopardy. The fact sheet is available at www.farmwater.org/BDCP-NRDC_alt.pdf.

The Dos Palos farmer grows almonds on the valley's Westside and when water is available, he also grows cannery tomatoes. In recent years when water deliveries have been reduced, he has been forced to forego the tomato acreage in order to divert all his water to almond orchards.  

Coburn stressed that the current twin-tunnel being considered by BDCP provides a reliable water supply that is needed by farmers, families and businesses. Without such a supply, the production of fresh fruits and vegetables that San Joaquin Valley farmers are known for would be in jeopardy.

Discuss this Article 4

Anonymous (not verified)
on Feb 25, 2013

What BDCP does fails to evaluate the impact that would be created for Delta farms and communities. The Portfolios analysis is an alternative that must be evaluated to make a better BDCP. Exports still need to occur, but as with most things, it's how we manage those exports. Let's find a way to get the Valley a reliable water source, and provide a reliable Delta water supply for existing local farmers and communities. One shouldn't happen without the other.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Feb 25, 2013

If he pointed out that the single tunnel would cut water deliveries to south-of-the-Delta water users by a third, why can't the article say why this is so?

John Herrick (not verified)
on Feb 26, 2013

The fears of southern valley farmers are focused on the wrong issue. After the 2007-2008 drought years, 2009 started with the CVP notifying the Exchange Contractors that there was insufficient storage to meet their demands. DWR and USBR also petitioned the SWRCB for relief from outlfow obligations because their was insufficient storage. This means that after only a two yeasr drought the CVP/SWP system was bankrupt! There was no water for export until it began to rain in late February. Whether we have large tunnels or one smaller tunnel does not change this system-wide shortage unless the projects intend to take water which is not theirs as they did in Febg of 2009 (DWR/USBR exported one third of the fishery flow rather than have it meet the standard). Reports of the smaller tunnnel affecting deliveries are accounting sleight of hand. Where is the export water if 2007-beginning of 2009 repeats?

Deirdre Des Jardins (not verified)
on Mar 5, 2013

SJV farmers need to look at the increased O&M costs for BDCP. The estimates I saw were about an extra $100 an acre. Critically dry years are now about 20% of all years. Can SJV farmers afford these kind of payments in dry and critically dry years?

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Western Farm Press ID
(optional)

Continuing Education Courses
This accredited CE course focuses on choosing the correct variety alfalfa based on a number of...
New Course
The 2,000-member Weed Science Society of America’s (WSSA) Herbicide Resistance Action...

The course details six of the primary diseases affecting citrus: Huanglongbing (Citrus...

Newsletter Signup