Nearly 40 percent of House urges Clean Water Act guidance reconsideration

  • A bipartisan group of 170 U.S. representatives wrote Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson and Assistant Secretary of the Army's Civil Works agency Jo-Ellen Darcy to voice strong concern about the agencies' efforts to expand the regulatory scope of the Clean Water Act (CWA) term "waters of the United States."

A bipartisan group of 170 U.S. representatives wrote Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson and Assistant Secretary of the Army's Civil Works agency Jo-Ellen Darcy to voice strong concern about the agencies' efforts to expand the regulatory scope of the Clean Water Act (CWA) term "waters of the United States."

Lawmakers said the agencies are using a guidance document, rather than a legislative change or regulatory rulemaking process, to expand the scope of the law.  The term, "waters of the United States," includes federal jurisdiction over wetlands, as well as navigable waterways.

Representatives told agency leaders that if the administration wants to change the CWA, it must propose legislative changes to Congress or notify the public about rule changes and seek comment, however they "cannot, through guidance, change the scope and meaning of the Clean Water Act or the statute's implementing regulations."

Lawmakers are concerned that the guidance document would "undermine the regulated community's rights...and erode the federal-state partnership" that implements the CWA by substantively changing the agencies' policy on waters subject to the statute's jurisdiction.

The rice-district lawmakers who signed the letter are: Reps. Jo Ann Emerson (R-Mo.), Mike Ross (D-Ark.), Rodney Alexander (R-La.), Wally Herger (R-Calif.), Dennis Cardoza (D-Calif.), Pete Olson (R-Texas), Rick Crawford (R-Ark.), Charles Boustany (R-La.), Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-Mo.), Tim Griffin (R-Ark.), Ralph Hall (R-Texas), Jeff Landry (R-La.), Steve Fincher (R-Tenn.), Tom Womack (R-Ark.), and Jeff Denham (R-Calif.).

Discuss this Article 1

Anonymous (not verified)
on May 26, 2012

This is nothing new. EPA and Corp of Enginners have been using their powers to conttrol what ever they want to. This has been true for every administration for many tears regardles of what political group is in power. Many times there is merit in what they are trying to do but the agency people often get carried away and try to go overboard with their control. From my experience it is often people who have little knowledge about the farmers and others that their decisiojs affect. I am a retired scientist who has had some techinical diagreements with the EPA on the application of rules. However, I have also had some good experiences with some EPA people that will listen and worked out a compromise based on the actual site conditions. Someetimes, new less exprienced EPA employes like to. exert their powers beyond reason. As a Republican I have had disagements with EPA when the Republicans were in power. Maybe a little more than when the Democrats were in power.i..

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Western Farm Press ID
(optional)

Continuing Education Courses
This accredited CE course focuses on choosing the correct variety alfalfa based on a number of...
New Course
The 2,000-member Weed Science Society of America’s (WSSA) Herbicide Resistance Action...

The course details six of the primary diseases affecting citrus: Huanglongbing (Citrus...

Newsletter Signup