Keeping company with extremists bad news for agriculture industry

  • Kristina Butts, NCBA executive director of legislative affairs, said while cattlemen make it their top priority to care for their animals, there are organizations that attempt to paint a different picture of animal agriculture.

Tom Talbot, chairman of the National Cattlemen's Beef Association (NCBA) Cattle Health and Well-Being Committee, led a lively discussion during their meeting, Feb. 3, 2012, during the Cattle Industry Convention and NCBA Trade Show. Conversation ranged from the latest science and research to ensuring effective cattle care to federal legislation to mandate on-farm production practices and more. Talbot said despite challenges cattle producers face, raising healthy cattle is and always has been a top priority.

"The U.S. beef industry has changed through the years, but the one thing that remains the same is our commitment to raising healthy cattle and providing our animals the best care possible," Talbot said. "NCBA's Cattle Health and Wellbeing Committee relies on the latest information from government officials, veterinarians and cattle health experts to ensure our policies reflect the latest science and ensure effective cattle care practices on cattle operations throughout the country."

Kristina Butts, NCBA executive director of legislative affairs, said while cattlemen make it their top priority to care for their animals, there are organizations that attempt to paint a different picture of animal agriculture. Specifically, Butts discussed an agreement entered into by the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and the United Egg Producers to seek federal legislation to mandate egg production practices. Butts said legislation introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Congressman Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.) to codify that agreement creates a slippery slope to allow the federal government to mandate on-farm production practices for all sectors of the agricultural industry.

"This legislation opens up Pandora's Box on Capitol Hill. While this bill currently only applies to the egg industry, it's not a far stretch to see it applied to all animal agriculture," Butts said. "Cattlemen proactively worked with veterinarians and cattle health experts to develop production guidelines. We worked together to improve our industry. Unfortunately, a one-size fits all federal mandate telling farmers and ranchers how to do their jobs is not acceptable."

Dr. Dave Daley, a cow-calf producer from California and the animal science department chairman at Chico State University, continued the discussion of animal rights organizations agendas and the impact of those agendas on the cattle industry. Daley said cattlemen need to take charge of the conversation about the industry.

"We sometimes don't like change but think about the changes in our industry. We're better producers today because we've changed," Daley said. "If you don't want HSUS to tell you want to do, you need to decide that. In agriculture, we are good at talking to each other. But we have to change that. We have to talk to people outside agriculture about what we do. We have to lead the conversation."

Discuss this article 9

Why are cattle farmers more qualified to legislate about eggs than egg farmers?? United Egg Producers endorse the bill, and so do the American people by a margin of 12 to 1. Professor Daley is right, farmers do need to talk to people outside agriculture, but more than that, they need to LISTEN. Everyone supports this legislation except for beef farmers, and they are not affected!!

The slippery slope argument is ridiculous. If the cattlemen don't want an agreement with HSUS, then they dont have to don't make one!! Meanwhile, don't try to destroy agreements other people have made, especially when they have nothing to do with you.

By AmyK (not verified)  on Feb 7, 2012

The Humane Slaughter Act was passed in 1958, over the objections of the USDA, the American Meat Institute, the Farm Bureau, and the National Cattlemen's Assocation. Industry spokespeople angrily insisted that the industry knew what was best and could self-police, and that regulation would create a slippery slope that would destroy the industry.

That legislation established minimal standards for humane slaughter. Animals could not be shackled and hoisted while conscious. Animals could not be killed with a poleax. Basic, commonsense regulation to eliminate cruelty, now embraced by the industry as "standard practice".

The meat industry has fought every attempt to ensure that animals are treated with basic, commonsense, humane handling. And as history has shown us 44 years later, it's a knee-jerk defensive reaction with no basis in reality.

By John Doppler Schiff (not verified)  on Feb 7, 2012

"American consumers 'overwhelmingly support' the agreement between The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and the United Egg Producers (UEP) and the legislation that was introduced in Congress last week to effect it, according to a survey that was released today.
...
"Consumers support the transition to colonies by a margin of 12-to-1, support the federal legislation by a margin of 4-to-1 and support the federal legislation over state legislation by a margin of 2-to-1, according to the survey.
...
"The study was commissioned by UEP and conducted by The Bantam Group, which conducted two surveys from Dec. 27, 2011, through Jan. 20. The first survey asked consumers about their support of the agreement, and the second asked consumers about their support for federal legislation.

"UEP's identity as the sponsor of the survey was not disclosed to the consumers surveyed so as not to bias responses, according to the announcement." -- Feedstuffs

http://www.feedstuffs.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=F4D1A9DFCD974EAD8CD5205E15C...

By Janet Weeks (not verified)  on Feb 7, 2012

Be careful what you wish for.

The most radical elements of the animal rights movement want this to fail as much as the non-UEP agriculture crowd. I recommend checking out animal rights scholar Gary Francione's blog post "The HSUS-United Egg Producer Agreement: Two Reactions".

What many of us realize that you don't is that there is enough popular support to pass ballot initiatives like California's Prop. 2 in other states. Look at deals cut in Michigan, Ohio and Nebraska in the wake of Prop. 2 as examples.

Those laws would be nullified by the UEP bill because federal regulations would "pre-empt" state regulations. I'm an animal rights supporter and I can honestly say that I won't shed a tear if the UEP bill flops because then our movement pass even stronger legislation at the state level. I guarantee if this bill fails groups like HSUS will successfully advance bills banning gestation crates for pigs, requiring cage-free egg production, requiring all cows are grass-fed, or other similar animal welfare regulations.

By Chris B (not verified)  on Feb 7, 2012

If you folks plan to "talk to people outside agriculture ", you might consider dropping the 'extremist' bit...

Unless you wanna be laughed out the room.

No one outside your comfort zone is buying that bullpoop...

The HSUS is mainstream middle-of-the road middle-class and accepted by the vast majority of Americans as so.

Maybe it's time to start marching with the band.

By Terry Ward  on Feb 7, 2012

all of the above commmentors are HSUS operatives.
I ask this question.. If this deal goes through and "enriched cages" are made law.. then will the HSUS never try to get "cage free" animals again? oh and pigs will fly.. here is a quote from an HSUS employee Miyun Park and aonther from Jennifer Fearing HSUS rep in CA
from Miyun Park at HSUS:
". our goal is to reduce the greatest amount of suffering for the greatest number of animals. We don't want any of these animals to be raised and killed....­.unfortuna­tely we don't have the luxury of waiting until we have the opportunit­y to get rid of the entire industry.

.. the Humane Society of the United States, we work on promoting veganism, ...

We have a very active cage-free campaign. Are we saying that cage-free eggs are the way to go? No, that’s not what we’re saying. But we’re saying it’s a step in the right direction, getting these birds out of cages so that maybe they can actually spread their wings."

So what makes any of you think the HSUS will stop at "enriched cages" ?
Jennifer Fearing of HSUS in CA has already stated that the new enriched cages are NOT ACCEPTABLE under the guidelines of Prop 2:
"The Humane Society has said that no cage system on the market, including those installed by J.S. West, will satisfy the language of the initiative­, which takes effect in 2015.

..Jennifer Fearing, the Humane Society's state director, says the design will not satisfy Prop 2,

The system "is not going to be compliant with California law," Fearing said. "We contend that cage-free is the minimally compliant system."

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Feb 7, 2012

try to find one single recipe on the HSUS website that contains ANY animal product at all. terry can you point one out.. how about you John.. and Amy K. see anything there that say.. yes eat a nice bowl of ice cream.. amde wiht MILK.. or have a "humanely raised" piece of steak tonight for dinner.. or even yogurt? nope not there.. why ? because the HSUS promotes veganism.. they say it over and over and yet you still do not believe them.. what part of your brain is missing from all of that tofu
Miyun Park HSUS:
"unfortunately we don't have the luxury of waiting until we have the opportunity to get rid of the entire industry.

And so because of that, a number of organizations including the Humane Society of the United States, we work on promoting veganism,"

and from Paul Shapiro HSUS:Shapiro wrote:

Like it or not, hundreds of millions of Americans consume mainstream media every day-along with animal products, as well. … These are the very people who must change their eating habits in order for animal liberation to become possible.

While it would be great to wait for the public to start consuming independent media, to force animals to wait for their liberation until such a societal shift takes place is both unfair and unethical…

The only way we can fundamentally reduce the level of animal suffering is to reduce the number of animals people eat."
HSUS is an anti animal organization that wants no animals "used" for anything.. and that includes your pets. They prefer extinction of domestic animals to the "use" of them Please do not support them

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Feb 7, 2012

"Everyone supports this legislation except for beef farmers, and they are not affected!! "

say AmyK

well thanks Amy for speaking for "everybody" but you do not speak for me or anyone I know

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Feb 7, 2012

vast majority?? huh.. they claim to have 11 million "member" ( anyone who has ever sent them a dime.. dead or alive is classified as a "member".. and even 11 million is hardly a "vast majority".. just like HSUS playing fast and loose with the non stats.
you can believe NO ONE in my office supports the HSUS and they have friends as well..mainstream Americans eat meat, eggs and dairy products.

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Feb 7, 2012
Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Western Farm Press ID
(optional)

Continuing Education Courses
New Course
The 2,000-member Weed Science Society of America’s (WSSA) Herbicide Resistance Action...
New Course

The course details six of the primary diseases affecting citrus: Huanglongbing (Citrus...

Get the latest info on almond insect pest management.
Farmer-to-Farmer Used Equipment