EPA greenhouse gas regulations burden farmers

  • Costs incurred by utilities, refiners, manufacturers and other large emitters to comply with GHG regulatory requirements will be passed on to the consumers of those products, including farmers and ranchers.

Many of America's farmers and ranchers will face economic challenges due to the Environmental Protection Agency's plan to regulate greenhouse gases, the American Farm Bureau Federation told a House subcommittee.

Carl Shaffer, president of the Pennsylvania Farm Bureau, testified on behalf of AFBF before the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Energy and Power.

"Costs incurred by utilities, refiners, manufacturers and other large emitters to comply with GHG regulatory requirements will be passed on to the consumers of those products, including farmers and ranchers," Shaffer said. "The end result is that our nation's farmers and ranchers will be forced to contend with higher input costs to grow food, fiber and renewable fuels."

Shaffer said farmers will face another economic hit when regulations are fully phased in under EPA's "tailoring" approach which will apply to farms and ranches that emit, or have the potential to emit, more than 100 tons of greenhouse gases per year. Those farms and ranches will be required to apply for and obtain a Title V operating permit. Based on EPA's numbers, Shaffer said just the expense of obtaining permits would cost agriculture more than $866 million.

In his testimony, Shaffer expressed Farm Bureau's support for the House-passed Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011, which prevents EPA from regulating greenhouse gases. Farm Bureau opposes the regulation of greenhouse gases by EPA under the Clean Air Act.

Discuss this Article 3

GilbertEA (not verified)
on Jun 21, 2012

I hope that more people are making the connection between regulatory policy and a lack of economic growth. Though they are designed to protect, regulatory policy is becoming more and more invasive as we are trying to make this real economic recovery. I think that it's time the EPA take a look at what its asking for and where we are as a country trying to accomplish. Work together rather than trying to play the power game.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Jun 30, 2012

We desperately need to disband the EPA

This too shall pass (not verified)
on Jun 30, 2012

This is just a back door approach to "Cap and Trade". A
funding plan for the big banks and Al Gore's business scheme. Accept it, don't vote and you will be calling each
of us "Comrade" before you know it. Get rid of EPA and
restore Glass Steigle.

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Western Farm Press ID
(optional)

Continuing Education Courses
This accredited CE course focuses on choosing the correct variety alfalfa based on a number of...
New Course
The 2,000-member Weed Science Society of America’s (WSSA) Herbicide Resistance Action...

The course details six of the primary diseases affecting citrus: Huanglongbing (Citrus...

Newsletter Signup