Beef association opposes mandate on animal agriculture

  • Tom Talbot, a veterinarian and California cattle rancher, is appalled that animal care could be taken out of the hands of experts and placed in the control of the federal government.

Tom Talbot, chairman of the National Cattlemen's Beef Association (NCBA) Cattle Health and Well-Being Committee, said despite challenges cattlemen and women face, raising healthy cattle is and always has been a top priority. Talbot, who is a veterinarian and California cattle rancher, is appalled that animal care could be taken out of the hands of experts and placed in the control of the federal government. Specifically, Talbot is referring to amendment 2252 to the 2012 Farm Bill offered by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.). The amendment, which would mandate on-farm production practices, was also introduced as legislation, Egg Inspection Act Amendments of 2012 (S. 3239 and H.R. 3298), by Sen. Feinstein and Congressman Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.).

"The U.S. beef community has changed through the years, but the one thing that remains the same is our commitment to raising healthy cattle and providing our animals the best care possible," Talbot said. "NCBA's Cattle Health and Wellbeing Committee relies on the latest information from government officials, veterinarians and cattle health experts to ensure our policies reflect the latest science and ensure effective cattle care practices on cattle operations throughout the country."

Talbot said while cattlemen make it their top priority to care for their animals, there are organizations that attempt to paint a different picture of animal agriculture. Talbot said the amendment to the farm bill would codify an agreement entered into by the Humane Society of the United States and the United Egg Producers to seek federal legislation to mandate egg production practices. Talbot said the agreement creates a slippery slope to allow the federal government to mandate on-farm production practices for all sectors of the agricultural industry.

"This legislation opens up Pandora's Box on Capitol Hill. While this bill currently only applies to the egg industry, it's not a far stretch to see it applied to all animal agriculture," Talbot said. "Cattlemen proactively worked with veterinarians and cattle health experts to develop production guidelines. We worked together to improve our industry. Unfortunately, a one-size fits all federal mandate telling farmers and ranchers how to do their jobs is not acceptable."

Talbot said he is disappointed in Sen. Feinstein and urges all U.S. senators to side with family farmers and ranchers by rejecting amendment 2252 to the farm bill and the legislation altogether.

Discuss this Article 9

Terry Ward
on Jun 15, 2012

'Pandora's Box' was opened long ago when you folks decided to plop livestock onto assembly lines as if they were Toyotas or lawn mowers.
And as for trying to get all those horrors back in the box?.
How's that workin' for 'ya?

Anonymous (not verified)
on Jun 16, 2012

As foolish communities and Politicians allow development on prime Agriculture land, the only way to produce the food this over bloated population needs is to industrialize the production. If we were to conform to the Organic guidelines or the Bleeding Hearts of the Animal rights idiots we would require a land mass the size of all of South America to meet the production required. The lack of medications for pests and Parasites puts the consuming public at risk for disease. That rare steak might very well kill you. The pressure from Green energy has driven the costs of production of livestock to the point of excluding the small farmer/rancher, forcing the industrial producers to be the only profitable producers.

Janet Weeks V (not verified)
on Jun 17, 2012

Unfortunately, Mr. Cattleman, public perception is that animal farmers use industry-commissioned, industry-purchased, and industry-accepted "science" that is geared toward the fastest growth of the animals in the least amount of space for the greatest amount of profit. Your "science" does not protect or even consider an animal's emotional or psychological well-being. The animals-for-profit industry has proven time and time again, through undercover investigation after investigation, that it is incapable of policing itself and providing animals with decent, morally acceptable lives before they are summarily slaughtered.

The public has seen your drugged chickens crammed 6 to 8 birds into cages so small the hens can't stretch even one wing, stacked one atop the other, row after row, in bleak, fetid, windowless sheds, standing on feces- and dead-bird encrusted wire their entire lives, never seeing or feeling the sun, scratching the earth, or foraging for seeds and bugs. The public has seen your drugged sows enduring pregnancy after pregnancy in their own filth in gestation crates barely larger than their bodies, never able to escape, breathe fresh air, turn around, lie down comfortably, and certainly never able to nurture or protect their young. We've seen the bars of their cages red with blood where the animals have chewed their mouths raw out of sheer boredom and learned despair. The public has also seen how you treat newborn calves, dragging them away from their drugged mothers with their umbilical cords still attached, mothers mooing in anguish and distress. The babies, if allowed to live, are raised artificially by humans--not their own mothers. Heaven forbid the babies should ever taste the milk their mothers produced just for them.

These are but a few examples of what we've seen, and they do not include the many body mutilations animal farmers perform on young animals without any pain relief or anesthesia. We've seen the cruelty your "science" inflicts on innocent, young creatures and we're appalled and outraged. That is why in 2008, 63% of California voters voted in favor of Prop. 2, the Protection of Farmed Animal Cruelty Act. All of these practices need changing and not for maximum profit. They need changing because it's the right thing to do. It is morally unacceptable to treat living, feeling beings as production units, the way "modern" animal agriculture, more commonly known as factory farming, treat them.

http://youtu.be/THIODWTqx5E

Anonymous (not verified)
on Jun 18, 2012

If only the same people who cared about the well-being of animals cared for the well being of unborn humans.

Janet Weeks V (not verified)
on Jun 18, 2012

Who says they don't? It is possible to care about more than one entity at the same time.

Janet Weeks V (not verified)
on Jun 17, 2012

The public has seen your drugged chickens crammed 6 to 8 birds into cages so small the hens can't stretch even one wing, stacked one atop the other, row after row, in bleak, fetid, windowless sheds, standing on feces- and dead-bird encrusted wire their entire lives, never seeing or feeling the sun, scratching the earth, or foraging for seeds and bugs. The public has seen your drugged sows enduring pregnancy after pregnancy in their own filth in gestation crates barely larger than their bodies, never able to escape, breathe fresh air, turn around, lie down comfortably, and certainly never able to nurture or protect their young. We've seen the bars of their cages red with blood where the animals have chewed their mouths raw out of sheer boredom and learned despair. The public has also seen how you treat newborn calves, dragging them away from their drugged mothers with their umbilical cords still attached, mothers mooing in anguish and distress. The babies, if allowed to live, are raised artificially by humans--not their own mothers. Heaven forbid the babies should ever taste the milk their mothers produced just for them.

Janet Weeks V (not verified)
on Jun 17, 2012

These are but a few examples of what we've seen, and they do not include the many body mutilations animal farmers perform on young animals without any pain relief or anesthesia. We've seen the cruelty your "science" inflicts on innocent, young creatures and we're appalled and outraged. That is why in 2008, 63% of California voters voted in favor of Prop. 2, the Prevention of Farmed Animal Cruelty Act. All of these practices need changing and not for maximum profit. They need changing because it's the right thing to do. It is morally unacceptable to treat living, feeling beings as production units, the way "modern" animal agriculture, more commonly known as factory farming, treat them.

http://youtu.be/THIODWTqx5E

hutch (not verified)
on Jun 18, 2012

'' nothin more dangerous than a fool with a cause'' i pray that GOD salvages something of this mess of a world for my children's sake. as for me i'm wore out from this nonsense...let em starve. that's one way to thin the population some....vaya con DIOS, janet and all the other anti-ag zealots

Anonymous (not verified)
on Jun 18, 2012

It is the dairy industry that is disgusting, not the beef cattle producer who is trying to grow cattle in open spaces. Could we please separate the beef industry from the dairy industry ? While Janet Weeks sounds unhinged, she is correct about the abhorrent practices going on right now in Central California for example. Anyone who has visited a dairy there and has any compassion at all would be disgusted. But the grossly obese American consumer wants food , and they want it now and they want it cheap and they dont want to get off their sizeable rear ends to grow it or produce it. We have created a situation in this country where confined agriculture is the only option. Environmentalists have made many lands off limits so they can control it and they alone can use it, greedy developers only care about converting arable land to houses or shopping centers, politicians only want to stay in office and will sell their souls and the new progressive "green" industries take away needed foodstuffs. Then you have the, yes ... greedy farmers and ranchers waiting for the next government check. We have met the enemy and they are us. Since we apparently cannot control ourselves, someone, the government, will step in and do it. We are to blame for not policing our own industries. Where is the Milk Board in sanctioning it s members for cruel practices, where is the NCBA in sanctioning its members for cattle starvation, neglect and mistreatment? If we don't do it, someone else will. So stop complaining.

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Western Farm Press ID
(optional)

Continuing Education Courses
This accredited CE course focuses on choosing the correct variety alfalfa based on a number of...
New Course
The 2,000-member Weed Science Society of America’s (WSSA) Herbicide Resistance Action...

The course details six of the primary diseases affecting citrus: Huanglongbing (Citrus...

Newsletter Signup