Farm Press Blog

Whiskey is for drinking; agriculture water is for fighting

RSS

A bottle of whiskey makes for sipping. Water makes for a political and regulatory hot potato in the West.

Author and humorist Mark Twain is given credit for the saying, “Whiskey is for drinking; water is for fighting.” It is unknown if Twain ever spoke those words.

A bottle of whiskey makes for sipping. Water makes for a political and regulatory hot potato in the West.

In California, water wars continue to get nastier as politicians and regulatory officials support water use to save the Delta smelt (good fish bait) instead of using water for agriculture to feed and clothe the world’s population where one in seven people go to bed hungry each night.

This is a human travesty.

To make the water issue worse, Mother Nature underperformed this winter. Good early rains and snows were followed by a January through March dry period, perhaps the driest in California history.

As a result of both, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation recently backpedalled on promised water allocations. Water available to south of the Delta agricultural water service contractors dropped from 25 percent to 20 percent.

Translation – less water for the most fertile and productive farming region in the world. It’s a travesty.

 

Want access to the very latest in agriculture news each day? Sign up for the Western Farm Press Daily e-mail newsletter.

 

Across the border, drought is now a four-letter word in Arizona. According to the Arizona Department of Water Resources, Arizona is in the 11th or 12th consecutive official year of drought.

One of Arizona’s most respected water leaders is Herb Guenther, former ADWR director. Guenther told about 600 farmers and industry members at the Southwest Ag Summit this spring that Arizona is fortunate of have diverse sources of water.

The Colorado River delivers about 37 percent of Arizona’s water supply, or about 2.8 million acre feet annually. The Salt River system delivers about 1.3 million acre feet. The Gila River kicks in about 400,000 acre feet.

About 74 percent of the state’s water supplies are used to grow food and fiber. The previous figure was 86 percent until urban development snatched up more gallonage.

Yuma County, where almost all of the nation’s winter supply of vegetables is grown, has the most senior water rights on the Colorado River with a guaranteed 1.2 million acre feet of water annually.

As the Arizona drought worsens, there are ongoing threats to take away water from Yuma-area agriculture. So far it’s mostly hypothetical.

Farmers in central Arizona have the most to fear from prolonged drought, plus as with California, political-regulatory decisions which reduce the affordability to farm.

While California has its smelt huggers, Arizona has its coal haters. The Environmental Protection Agency will require stricter clean air standards at the coal-powered Navajo Generating Station; possibly a $1-billion-dollar upgrade.

The upgrade would significantly increase the cost to push water through the 336-mile-long Central Arizona Project. The CAP delivers water from the Colorado River near Parker through a canal system into central Arizona through Phoenix and then south of Tucson.

The CAP delivers water to about 80 percent of Arizona’s population, located in Maricopa, Pinal, and Pima counties. Central Arizona agriculture uses about half of the water delivered by the CAP annually – about 400,000 acre feet.

One estimate last year suggests about 30 percent of the farms in central Arizona could be forced out of business due to increased water costs tied to the NGS upgrade.

After this perusal of Western water issues, perhaps a sip of whiskey is timely.

cblake@farmpress.com

More from Western Farm Press:

Californians lose 800,000 acre-feet of water to 305 minnows

Bay Delta plan draws mixed reviews

Farmscrapers are vertical farming on steroids

Discuss this Blog Entry 7

JasonStone2013 (not verified)
on Mar 26, 2013

Mark Twain also said “too much of anything is bad, but too much of good whiskey is barely enough.” Now, judging by his words and his love of whiskey, I could say he either stashed countless bottles of whiskey in his home, or had one, big, trusty, whiskey still hidden, somewhere ;)

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 26, 2013

Backpedalling on "promised" allocations is a misrepresentation of the truth. Comments such as this highlight poor research and reporting. These allocations are only estimates. Why does the farming community continue to perpetuate falsehoods to further their agenda? This is another bad water year. Accept it and be thankful that you can fall back on taxpayer funded subsidies.

No Limits? (not verified)
on Mar 26, 2013

The Delta Smelt is a warning flag to humans that we are pushing the limits of what nature can provide. The evidence is all around us, yet some, like this author, continue to suggest that there are not limits, as if we can continue to grow forever without consequence. The arguments that we need to "feed the world" and that we shouldn't "complain when our mouths are full" are attempts to shut off debate about these very real limits. The sooner we understand that there are limits as to what the earth can provide, the better for all. This little fish is a warning sign, if we choose to listen.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 26, 2013

Fattest country in the world and we are whining about making less food.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 26, 2013

This debate is not only about smelt vs. farmers, the stance above oversimplifies it. It's also about the struggling salmon population, the fishing industry, recreational fishermen, and the overall health of the delta ecosystem. There is no longer enough water for all needs, and the salmon can't speak for themselves.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Mar 27, 2013

EMBARASSING! This article is a shame and more hurtful than helpful for anyone interested in this topic. I would have to say this article is closer to propaganda than journalism. The Delta Smelt is not important because of its size... and does not make "good fish bait"... just try it in front of law enforcement.

on Apr 7, 2013

Let me see if I get this right.... When the government restricts what you want to do (AKA taking the water you need to grow and sell your crops regardless of the consequences) it's a travesty. But when they act in your behalf in the form of subsidies, tax breaks, and protective tariffs, it's doing it's job. I guess I don't understand how this can be reconciled. Maybe if I drove a Dodge truck.........

Post new comment
or to use your Western Farm Press ID
What's Farm Press Blog?

The Farm Press Daily Blog

Connect With Us

Blog Archive
Continuing Education Courses
New Course
California is becoming the first state in the nation to invoke regulations to reduce Volatile...
New Course
Ant control is an important element of harvesting a high quality almond crop. It starts with...
This accredited CE course focuses on choosing the correct variety alfalfa based on a number of...

Sponsored Introduction Continue on to (or wait seconds) ×