Table of Contents:
- Organic versus conventional divide not helping agriculture
- Too self-sufficient?
What if the energy used to divide ag groups was instead used to coalesce and promote agricultural policy which benefits the greatest number of people?
I’m sure there’s much more to this than meets the eye - there always is. To the not-so-casual observer, the recent petition by 20 organic farm and consumer groups related to the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) seems a bit hypocritical.
PR Newswire is reporting that 20 groups petitioned USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack “to protect the authority and permanence of the NOSB,” whatever that means.
Folks are apparently upset that the NOSB, created by Congress in the 1990 farm lill, does not have dictatorial control over organic policy and federal law. Instead, its stated purpose is to advise the USDA. Good enough.
Apparently it’s not.
Organic proponents apparently want their own control of all things organic, absent the kind of oversight conventional farming has.
Two of the petitioners include the Center for Food Safety and “Beyond Pesticides.” While the center’s name sounds sublime enough, the other group’s politics are front and center in the title.
It would seem that this petition is less about an egregious act committed by the USDA and more about fear mongering.
Can’t we all just grow up and have an adult conversation about food policy in America without the fifth-grade accusations?