Farm Press Blog

More confusion than clarification in Supreme Court’s immigration ruling


• Both sides of the immigration issue are claiming victory, which is as sure a sign as any that no one really won the day. At best, the Supreme Court punted on this one.

Monday’s Supreme Court ruling that threw out key provisions of a controversial Arizona immigration law might have left more confusion than clarification, as states with similar laws — including Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, South Carolina and Utah – decide their next move.

Both sides of the immigration issue are claiming victory, which is as sure a sign as any that no one really won the day. At best, the Supreme Court punted on this one.

In a 5-3 ruling, justices let stand a provision in Arizona's immigration enforcement law that requires police to determine the immigration status of suspects when practicable and when they have a “reasonable suspicion” the person is in the country illegally. But the court invalidated provisions that would permit police to make warrantless arrests when people commit deportable offenses; punish people who fail to carry official immigration papers; and punish illegal immigrants who apply for work in Arizona.

Meanwhile, data published this past spring shows that for the first time in more than four decades, illegal migration from Mexico into the United States has fallen to a net zero. In other words, the undocumented population of the United States is no longer growing.

That’s right — for the first time in more than four decades, illegal migration from Mexico has fallen to zero. According to estimates from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the illegal immigrant population peaked at around 12 million in 2008, fell to 11 million in 2009 and has remained constant since then. Statistical analyses reveal the rate of new migration to the United States is essentially non-existent, while repeat visits by returned migrants are rare. In keeping with these calculations, border apprehensions have fallen to the lowest number since 1970, despite the fact that there are more Border Patrol agents on duty than ever.

But this trend had nothing to do with stricter state laws or stronger border enforcement. According to the National Academy of Sciences, it instead reflects the economic trends in Mexico and in the United States. In other words, there have been more job opportunities in Mexico than in the U.S. in recent years. If nothing else, our terrible economy might have slowed illegal immigration.

All of this begs the question of whether or not this issue demanded such swift action from our state legislators, especially at a time when other more pressing issues, such as chronic unemployment and budget shortfalls, continue to linger, and especially when such legislation was sure to generate a mountain of legal challenges.

In the next few days, weeks and months, legal analysts and others will work to determine the full impact of the court’s ruling on state statutes like those in Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina. For farmers who have to recruit and maintain a willing and qualified workforce, the uncertainty and confusion continues.




Discuss this Blog Entry 1

Doc Freeman (not verified)
on Jun 30, 2012

Buried in a Denver Post article is something that should concern residents of every state. According to the report, people legally working in the U.S. (including illegal aliens given amnesty by Obama) are eligible for unemployment benefits. If you are an employer expect your unemployment assessment to go up. Opponents of illegal immigration warned that the policy could create significant new competition for jobs and university slots at a time of nationwide recession and numerous states’ efforts to curb public spending. Half of all college graduates today can’t find jobs, and the unemployment rate for high-school-aged Americans is extremely high. This is unfair to U.S. citizens and legal immigrants who are out there struggling to get ahead. Federal law already grants all undocumented immigrants the right to a public-school education and emergency hospital care.
The new policy could entail additional costs for administration and enforcement, however, and put pressure on state systems of higher education to meet growing demand for slots. Critics predicted that it would have the opposite effect, proving difficult to enforce and encouraging more illegal immigrants to use false identification documents to fit within the amnesty’s legal requirements. Ten States have laws giving in-state tuition benefits to illegal immigrants, which I find is a terrible injustice to legal citizens from other States. Why should someone who is illegal be given instate tuition while a legal citizen from another State must pay higher tuition fees? Obama and his communist/Marist administration must go.

Post new comment
or register to use your Western Farm Press ID
What's Farm Press Blog?

The Farm Press Daily Blog

Connect With Us

Blog Archive
Continuing Education Courses
The purpose of this course is to give you a review of many aspects of spray drift – from...
Potassium nitrate has a positive effect in controlling plant pests and diseases when applied...
American agriculture exports 20 to 30 percent of its production annually. For specific...

Sponsored Introduction Continue on to (or wait seconds) ×