Farm Press Blog

Farmer privacy breach brings suit against EPA


Table of Contents:

  • Farmer privacy and agroterrorism are both factors in a suit against the EPA over the release of sensitive agriculture data.

When Animal Liberation Front terrorists set fire to 14 trailers at Harris Ranch Beef Co., in Coalinga, Calif., they knew a few drivers might be sleeping in the cabs. The ALF coordinated details of the farm attack perfectly: preparation, surveillance and execution. On Jan. 8, 2012, they hit Harris Ranch at 4 a.m., causing over $2 million in damage as “containers of an accelerant were placed beneath a row of 14 trucks with four digital timers used to light four of the containers and kerosene-soaked rope carrying the fire to the other 10.”

There were no drivers inside the trucks that morning — but there’s no way the ALF would have been certain of that. It was a chilling act and certainly one of the biggest agroterrorism attacks in U.S. history. ALF gloated over the attack in a release, ending it with “… until next time.”


For more, see Domestic terror attack on cattle feeding operation chilling


Instead of California’s San Joaquin Valley, that “next time” could be anywhere across American agriculture.

Roughly a year after the Harris Ranch attack, and despite growing alarm over the vulnerability of American agriculture (Former Secretary of Health and Human Services Tommy Thompson: “For the life of me, I cannot understand why the terrorists have not attacked our food supply, because it is so easy to do.) the EPA released private farmer data to three environmental groups after a Freedom of Information Act request. The scope of EPA-released material was immense, covering 29 states and over 80,000 farming operations.

The Natural Defense Council, Earthjustice and the Pew Charitable Trusts had filed the FOIA request to obtain agriculture information about Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs). However, the mass of material released by the EPA contained “… names of owners, addresses, global-positioning-system coordinates, phone numbers, e-mail addresses, and, in some instances, notes on medical conditions and inheritances.” From National Review: “In the last decade, the EPA has mounted a largely unsuccessful effort to increase permitting requirements for feedlots. But environmental groups were able to work out a settlement with the agency in 2010, compelling it to begin collecting CAFO data.


For the complete story, see Jillian Kay Melchior’s The EPA’s Privacy Problem


“In the fall of 2012, Earthjustice, the NRDC, and the Pew Charitable Trusts filed a public-records request for the information collected — “before any of the CAFO data collected by the EPA was made public,” according to a recent report from the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. That timeline, the report continues, “raises the possibility that EPA may have been collecting data on the groups’ behalf.” In early 2013, the EPA released to the three groups wholly unredacted data about farms and ranches in 29 states.”

Discuss this Blog Entry 3

Guest creature (not verified)
on Jan 21, 2014

the ALF does not hurt people

Guest Creature (not verified)
on Jan 23, 2014


thank you for not censoring/respecting free speech

for the animals


People (not verified)
on Feb 8, 2014

It is people you are hurting. Your delusions of benevolant anarchy are but an obvious form of antisocial pathology. I pray you and your ilk see the error of your ways before it's too late.

Post new comment
or register to use your Western Farm Press ID
What's Farm Press Blog?

The Farm Press Daily Blog

Connect With Us

Blog Archive
Continuing Education Courses
The purpose of this course is to give you a review of many aspects of spray drift – from...
Potassium nitrate has a positive effect in controlling plant pests and diseases when applied...
American agriculture exports 20 to 30 percent of its production annually. For specific...

Sponsored Introduction Continue on to (or wait seconds) ×