Farm Press Blog

Farm bill or food stamps? Congress must decide vexing issue

  • House defeated a farm bill for the first time ever on June 20
  • Leadership struggling to find answer to food stamp-farm bill dilemma
  • FARRM bill contained $20 billion in food stamp cuts


Do you want to do away with food stamps or have a new farm bill? That's the question congressional leaders have to address between now and Sept. 30.

By now, most have heard the House defeated the Federal Agricultural Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013, also known as the new farm bill, by a vote of 195-234. It was the first time the House had ever voted down a farm bill.

You’ve probably read about the accusations flying back and forth between Democrats and Republicans about who was responsible for the negative vote on the legislation, which passed the House Agriculture Committee on a bipartisan vote.

House Speaker John Boehner and Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., have said last-minute defections by several Democrats led to the defeat of the measure, which Boehner voted for after spending a year refusing to bring it to the House floor. Cantor and other Republicans haven’t talked about why those Democrats “walked away.”

A few minutes before the final vote, Rep. Steve Southerland, R-Fla., introduced an amendment that applied federal welfare work requirements to the food stamp program, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP. The amendment basically said food stamp recipients either had to be working or looking for work. The amendment passed 227-198.

What’s wrong with that? Well, it sounds good on the surface. But what about the farmers who have their employees sign up for food stamps when harvest is completed? In many rural communities, there are no jobs to look for or certainly none that would allow employees to return to the farm in the spring.

And what about those who lost their jobs in 2008 and finally gave up looking because the economy has been slower to recover than in any other modern recession? Democrats who were already concerned about the FARMM bill’s $20.5 billion cut in SNAP benefits told Rep. Collin Peterson, the House Agriculture Committee’s ranking Democrat, they couldn’t vote for the final bill.

All but one of the 62 Republican House members who voted against the farm bill voted for the Southerland amendment.

It’s no secret many Tea Party-backed members of Congress want to reduce the size of the federal government, and they see food stamps as a step toward that goal even though food stamp spending is less than 1 percent of the federal budget.

They cite the growth of food stamp spending to $81 billion in the last four years as reason for reducing outlays. They don’t mention that growth occurred during one of the longest recessions in this country’s history or that highly profitable companies (such as Wal-Mart) have cut wages or reduced hours so that many employees have to apply for food stamps to feed their families.

Democrats won’t vote for additional cuts to the program. And 62 Republican members believe the cuts weren’t deep enough. So it looks like we’re either going to have to get rid of food stamps or forego a new farm bill and let the 1949 permanent law take effect. Some choice, huh?



Discuss this Blog Entry 4

Tom in IN (not verified)
on Jul 11, 2013

Lunacy of the Wrong!
Love the author's reporting, he only omits: 1) to quantify the Hammer to the Food Sector that these crazy teapublicans are trying to apply to Farmers/Ranchers/Fishers; that Rep. Steve Southerland (R-FL) was acting with Eric-the-Brat Cantor's encouragement; and that we are really in the 2nd Great Depression, not merely an"other modern recession".

The proposed $20B cut to Food Stamp is both economic suicide to Ag and Ag processors, but also to the entire Economy. And it is anti-Christian. As SNAP (Food Stamps) represents Food that will not be bought otherwise, the cut represent a significant cut to Ag producers' Income., Plus, given the multiplier-effect the $20B represents a $140B cut to the Economy the US cannot afford.

Both Testaments are very explicit about taking care of each other. And the teachings of the Jewish Carpenter are clear on the subject. These teapublicans do not know their Bible despite their claims. They are worshiping Mammon, not God.

The teapublicans are seeking not only to destroy government, but also Christianity and what's left of the Republican Party.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Jul 11, 2013

The food stamp SNAP needs scrutiny. The EBT cards have few restrictions on what cannot be bought as food---EBT allows sugar coated cereals, candy, cookies, cakes, special water, chips, etc.etc--JUNK FOODS. If families can fill their grocery carts with junk food, what is the purpose of the SNAP ?? There are some EBT cards that allow use of ATMs to get cash. Leaves the issues of improper use of the SNAP cards---a waste of money. Opens the question of fraudulent use of the cards. Or the programing of the cards should reject the junk food category, just as they are suppose to do for soap, toothpaste,etc. If people on SNAP can buy junk food then there is the question of "do they really need that much money loaded on the cards? Or, with the technology available , reprogram the cards.

Tom in IN (not verified)
on Jul 12, 2013

You apparently have never stood behind a SNAP recipient in a Super check-out line.
Every one of your concerns would be blown out of the water, IF you had.
Please do some basic research.

Tom in IN (not verified)
on Jul 13, 2013

I guess you have never received SNAP nor stood behind a recipient in a supermarket check-out line??

None of your allegations are true.

Leaves the issue of whether you think you are knowledgeable enough to vote -- a waste of a vote.

Post new comment
or register to use your Western Farm Press ID
What's Farm Press Blog?

The Farm Press Daily Blog

Connect With Us

Blog Archive
Continuing Education Courses
The purpose of this course is to give you a review of many aspects of spray drift – from...
Potassium nitrate has a positive effect in controlling plant pests and diseases when applied...
American agriculture exports 20 to 30 percent of its production annually. For specific...

Sponsored Introduction Continue on to (or wait seconds) ×