Today there is more conservation in agriculture than ever before. More American farmers are choosing environmentally responsible management, protecting the land and improving the efficiency of their operations while adding to their bottom line.
The 2004 National Crop Residue Management Survey, released recently, confirms that 41 percent of all cropland is under a conservation tillage system, meaning that farmers leave the stubble or residue from the previous crop to cover at least one-third of the soil's surface after planting.
No-till, the most environmentally friendly production system, is used to the greatest extent, covering 62.4 million acres in 2004. By leaving the crop residue and reducing or eliminating tillage trips, farmers protect the soil from water and wind erosion, conserve moisture, reduce runoff, improve wildlife habitat, and limit output of labor, fuel and machinery.
The survey, last completed in 2002 and coordinated by the Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC) in partnership with USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, is a biennial survey of tillage systems used in the U.S.
Fourth of cropland
With a no-till system, most of the soil is undisturbed, and seeds are placed into the soil with minimal soil and residue disturbance. The Survey reports that no-till acres increased 7.1 million acres to 62.4 million, up from 55.3 million acres in 2002. That means no-till is used on almost 23 percent of all cropland in the country, up from 20 percent in 2002 and 17.5 percent in 2000.
Dan Towery, NRCS natural resources specialist who organizes data collection from each county in the U.S. says, “This survey documents the fact that farmers are able to increase soil productivity, protect the environment and, at the same time, make a profit. With conservation tillage being used on 113 million acres, up nearly 10 million acres from 2002, we know that more farmers than ever before are using conservation.”
The greatest increase in no-till acres occurred in South Dakota — over 2 million acres of no-till have been added since 2000. The reason, says Dwayne Beck of Dakota Lakes Research Farm, is economics. No-till systems with diverse crop rotations are economically superior to conventional farming in South Dakota. This is especially true in dry years because not tilling the ground saves valuable soil moisture.
“No-till has become the competitive edge here. Farmers have figured out the best crop rotation and pesticide program, and they are out-competing the conventional tillers for the land,” says Beck.
For additional information about the 2004 National Crop Residue Management Survey, contact CTIC at (765) 494-9555 or go online to www.ctic.purdue.edu.